Saturday, May 21, 2022
HomePorts/TerminalsBOC to forge data exchange arrangement with US, SoKor, Japan

BOC to forge data exchange arrangement with US, SoKor, Japan

Philippine Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez III has directed Bureau of Customs (BOC) officials to set up data exchange arrangements with South Korea, Japan, and the United States, similar to the one the country forged with China earlier, to ensure the seamless exchange of trade-related information between the Philippines and these major trading partners.

China, South Korea, Japan, and the US represent the Philippines’ top four trading partners that Dominguez wants the BOC to closely work with in monitoring shipments and checking discrepancies in trade data.

These include gaps in data on the volume and value of goods exported by these countries to the Philippines and data on the import volumes from these countries as reported by local revenue authorities, so as to check for possible illegal trade practices.

Dominguez said Customs Commissioner Isidro Lapeña and other BOC officials should establish communication lines and coordinate with the heads of the customs agencies of these four countries to accomplish this goal.

“You have to be able to pick up the phone and call them (the heads of other customs agencies) personally,” Dominguez told BOC officials during a recent Executive Committee meeting of the Department of Finance (DOF). BOC is an attached agency of DOF.

In a press briefing later, Dominguez said that “I asked him (Lapeña) to go to four countries: China, Japan, Korea, and the US. These are our four biggest trading partners.”

On his visit to Beijing last February 8 to February 10, Lapeña and his Chinese counterpart agreed to set up a data exchange system to facilitate the timely sharing of trade information in aid of their campaigns against smuggling and tax evasion.

BOC also requested from its counterpart in China data on Chinese commodity imports from and exports to the Philippines between 2015 and 2017; monthly or quarterly export and import data of China to the Philippines by commodity for 2018; and export data on all shipments going to the Philippines and manifest of vessels carrying cargoes bound for the Philippines.

The request for information was in compliance with Dominguez’s directive to Lapeña in 2017 for the BOC to check the narrowing but still significant gap between China’s registered export volumes to the Philippines and data on Philippine imports from China as officially reported here.

Following Dominguez’s order, Lapeña went to Beijing in February to personally discuss with officials of the General Administration of Customs of China (GACC) the Philippines’ concerns over these trade discrepancies.

During their meeting, the GACC officials expressed China’s support for the Philippines’ anti-smuggling efforts and agreed to designate focal persons from the two countries to facilitate coordination between their customs agencies.

According to BOC, a cooperative arrangement between BOC and GACC is scheduled to be signed during a proposed visit of Chinese officials to Manila in April this year.

Lapeña also met with director Yuan Ziwei and deputy director Zhao Ru Xiao of GACC’s international cooperation division to discuss the progress of the Philippines-China agreement concerning cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters. The pact was signed by the two countries in April 2010.

In December last year, Dominguez said official trade data show that the estimated discrepancy between registered Chinese exports to the Philippines and registered Philippine imports from China has been declining but still very large, with the gap reported at 60% in 2010; 57% in 2015; 48.7% in 2016; and 48% over the January-July 2017 period.

Registered Chinese exports to the Philippines in 2010 were at US$11.56 billion, but Philippine imports from China as reported by the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) amounted to $4.628 billion only, resulting in a trade discrepancy of 60% or $6.936 billion.

For the first seven months of 2017, Chinese exports to the Philippines were valued at $17.77 billion, while the PSA reported imports from China at $9.24 billion, or a discrepancy of 48% or $8.53 billion.

Compared to the previous years and to the same period in 2016, the January-July 2017 trade gap between China and the Philippines declined. From January to July last year, China’s exports to the Philippines were estimated at $17.10 billion, while PSA reported imports from China at $8.79 billion, or a discrepancy of 48.6% at $8.31 billion.

“It is going down but it’s still large,” Dominguez said.

Lapeña earlier reported to Dominguez that the wide discrepancy between China’s recorded exports and imports to the Philippines may be attributed to the gross misdeclaration or undervaluation of goods in terms of either volume or weight; and the possible use of “consignees for hire,” which leads to goods released to “hidden” traders and not to the consignees on record.

In 2015, trade data show that Chinese exports to the Philippines amounted $26.69 billion, against PSA’s records of imports from China of $11.47 billion or a gap of $15.22 billion. In 2016, the gap narrowed, with Chinese exports to the country at $30.35 billion, against PSA records of imports of $15.56 billion or a discrepancy of $14.79 billion.

Image courtesy of rajcreationzs at


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

20 − fifteen =

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

- Advertisment -