Home » Uncategorized » Industry Issues For Customs

Atty. Agaton Uvero IN recent weeks, the Commis-sioner of Customs and the Secretary of Finance have been consulting the private sector on its planned reforms at the Bureau of Customs (BOC).

For the past six months, various industry associations have been lobbying to institute customs reforms and address various problems with the BOC. In particular, the Port Users Confederation (PUC) and the Philippine International Seafreight Forwarders Association (PISFA) have submitted numerous position papers and have conducted meetings with the BOC. Unfortunately, all these past efforts to solve ongoing problems and to institute reforms were not acted upon by the previous administration. We have summarized below some of these industry issues and concerns now pending with the new customs commissioner.

E-Manifest Submissions

Under existing rules, shipping lines are required to submit the e-IFM 12 hours prior to vessel arrival. In the case of forwarders, the e-CCM must be submitted within six hours prior to arrival. The system automatically prevents carriers and forwarders from submitting beyond the period. Also, forwarders cannot submit the e-CCM unless the carriers are able to submit the e-IFM first. Late submissions are accepted only after manual intervention and after payment of penalties.

The current system has resulted in BOC personnel at both MICP and POM imposing penalties, mostly without official receipts.

This manual intervention by customs personnel totally defeats the purpose of automation. The system should automatically allow even late submissions considering that penalties will anyway be imposed against carriers and forwarders. The penalty should be enough without going through the complicated and more expensive process of manual customs intervention.

In a recent letter submitted to the new customs commissioner, PISFA requested the following:

  • To redesign/reconfigure of the e-manifest submission system to allow submission of e-manifest from freight forwarders without waiting for the submission from shipping lines;
  • Pending such redesign of the e-manifest system, to allow the automated submission even for late submission without manual intervention considering that penalties may still be imposed;
  • To automate the payment of the penalties; and
  • Pending implementation of the proposed changes, to hold in abeyance the imposition of penalties and to simply allow submission beyond the six hours from arrival in case of freight forwarders.

Importer’s Accreditation

Recently, BOC issued CMO 31-2010 which mandates all BOC-accredited importers to submit ITRs and VAT returns for the immediately preceding three years within 15 days from publication of said CMO. In a letter recently submitted to customs, PUC raised issues on the additional documentation by citing the following:

  • The submission of ITRs and VAT returns are already covered under the Post Entry Audit regime. Under existing rules, BOC can audit companies within three years from importation and as part of the mandatory record keeping requirements, all importers are mandated to present their ITRs and VAT returns to the customs auditors upon conduct of a compliance audit.
  • In the past years, the industry has been advocating for transparency and simplification in the accreditation process and in recent years, the PUC has been able to request BOC to reduce the number of documents required for accreditation. PUC member associations fear that the additional documents required will be a reversal to the old tedious and costly process.
  • The CMO does not cover cases where companies are newly-registered (with no previous ITRs and VAT returns yet) or not subject to VAT (e.g. PEZA companies).

PUC also submitted its recommendations as follows:

  • Instead of annual accreditation, the following companies should be exempt from the renewal of accreditation: (a) Locators in PEZA zones; (b) Locators in Clark and Subic Freeports and (c) Top 1000 importers for the last three years (duties and taxes paid). Subject to certain risk management parameters and in case a company has derogatory records, said company shall however be required to submit its annual renewal.
  • In lieu of the annual renewal of accreditation, exempted companies shall submit an annual report (e.g., on or before June 30 of each year) containing the following: (a) ITRs and VAT returns for the preceding year; (b) List of Importation (including volume and value); (c) List of Suppliers; and (d) List of Customs Brokers / Forwarders. Failure of exempted companies to submit this annual report shall be a ground for the revocation of its accreditation with the BOC.

The author is the legal director of AFPI, PISFA and PUC. He is a lecturer on logistics, indirect tax and customs, and a trainor of Ateneo Graduate School and BayanTrade Academy on International Supply Chain Management. Please contact agatonuvero@yahoo.com for your comments.

No comments yet... Be the first to leave a reply!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

two × 3 =

Please support the site
By clicking any of these buttons you help our site to get better
Social PopUP by SumoMe
Copy Protected by Chetan's WP-Copyprotect.