PortCalls
The Philippines only shipping and  transport guide.
 
5th Philippine Ports and Shipping 2009

::Industry News::


Archives 2008 : Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec

September 1 | September 3 | September 8 | September 10 | September 15 | September 17

September 22 | September 24 | September 29


* Shipping industry facing return to regulation?

* Pac-Atlantic opens Australia subsidiary, offers direct RP-Australia service

* All port stakeholders to start client profile data build-up

* Marina to carriers: High fuel prices not enough to warrant rate adjustments

* North Harbor privatization gets boost

Shipping industry facing return to regulation?

FOUR years after the shipping industry’s deregulation via Republic Act 9295 or the Domestic Shipping Development Act of 2004, the Maritime Industry Authority (Marina) is mulling a return to a more regulated regime.
In a keynote speech during last week’s Supply Chain Management Association of the Philippines (SCMAP) conference and exhibit, Marina administrator Ma. Elena Bautista said the deregulation has caused more harm than good, causing rates to soar and allowing shipping lines to alter sailing schedules at the drop of a hat in the race for more profit.
“We are looking at regulating back the local shipping industry considering that the law only deregulates the rate-setting mechanism of carriers but not the entire shipping industry,” Bautista said.
Under the law, the Marina chief finds compliance by shipping lines to certain requirements — specifically scheduling of trips — problematic. “They tend to alter their announced schedules to get better business due to the full deregulation being implemented,” she explained.
“Frankly, we have no defense if ever anyone sues Marina for fully deregulating the industry — the very reason why I ordered the immediate revision of the IRR (implementing rules and regulations of RA 9295) and focus only on what the law deregulates and delete other provisions inconsistent with the law,” Bautista said.
Once the IRR is amended, Marina can for instance compel shipping lines to stick to their announced trip schedules and regulate rate increases in keeping with the times.
Marina has begun deliberations on the contested IRR provisions. Board approval is eyed in the next two months and implementation within the year, Bautista said.


Pac-Atlantic group managing director Ramon de Leon (left) with
Australian partner Jeff Bramston. Standing is Pac-Atlantic Lines general manager Tyrone Regaliza.

Back to Top

 

Pac-Atlantic opens Australia subsidiary, offers direct RP-Australia service

AT a time when most businesses are shying away from expansion, Pac-Atlantic Holdings Co Inc is doing the exact opposite. It recently launched its Australian subsidiary, Pac-Atlantic Australia, in partnership with Manila Express Freight Forwarding Pty Ltd of Australia.
In an interview, Pac-Atlantic Holdings group managing director Ramon T. De Leon said the opening of the Australian subsidiary will create a niche for Pac-Atlantic in the region, cementing its status as one of the top logistics firms in the area.
The direct Philippines vis-à-vis Australia offering will also serve as a jump-off point for services to other regional markets, specifically Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, China and Indonesia.
“Easily, I can say that we will register an additional 10-20% growth because of the new service in its first year of operations,” De Leon told PortCalls. “Further growth is expected once we start incorporating the trade lane to our worldwide network.”
Jeff Bramston, Manila Express managing director, said he has confidence in the partnership, noting Pac-Atlantic stands for trust, speed, reliability, and cost competitiveness.
Bramston said the subsidiary’s initial focus is the regional market then, in the next two to three years, the long-haul markets of US and Europe.
“Being the only one offering a direct service, we can offer our clients better rates, faster transit time and more value which other firms cannot offer,” he explained.
“Only we offer such a service, no co-loading, no agents involved, the only major logistics firm in the Australia-Philippines trade lane to do so,” Bramston added. “With the dedicated service, we expect potential and viable growth and (a) much better service angle for the company.”
The service offers a 50% reduction in transit times to Australia to 17-19 days. In contrast, non-direct services passing through Singapore take 25-27 days.
From two times a week, service frequency will also be upped to three times a week.
Pac-Atlantic Australia offers consolidation and LCL (less than a container load) and soon, full container load and more breakbulk consolidation.
More than two months since its incorporation on July 1, the company is projecting to grow volume by one TEU a week from a TEU fortnightly and one 40-footer per week both for north- and south-bound cargoes.
In particular, it is eyeing a modest chunk of the country’s project cargoes, taking into consideration activity in the revived mining industry, a sector that is also seeing a boom in Australia.
Pac-Atlantic Holdings is the parent company of all subsidiaries and affiliate companies under the Pac-Atlantic Group of Companies. Its flagship, Pac-Atlantic Lines (Phils) Inc started in 1987 as a freight forwarder with only three employees. Today, the Pac-Atlantic group employs close to 250 full-time professionals within its subsidiaries and affiliates.
Part of the group’s growth strategy is to work with foreign partners that possess strong expertise in their respective fields. As a result, Pac-Atlantic has forged tie-ups with companies based in Singapore, Japan, the United States and Australia, and has joined worldwide networks to ensure sufficient rep-resentation in foreign ports.
Pac-Atlantic’s core activities revolve around integrated logistics services, though it has other interests in after-market services, information and communi-cations technology and property management.

Back to Top

 

All port stakeholders to start client profile data build-up

THE Bureau of Customs (BOC) has formally notified all port stakeholders that they may now start encoding their respective client profile data into the e2m Customs Client Profile Registration System (CPRS).
The CPRS is an internet-enabled software application that facilitates an automated process of accreditation and/or registration of all BOC stakeholders by their accrediting offices – either from BOC or other agencies.
Among information that will be encoded are business name and address, contact details (phone/fax/email address/mobile phone) and nature of business. Names and contact details of major stockholders, principal officers and responsible officers will also be submitted (a maximum number of names is set) as well as major clients and suppliers. Some of the abovementioned information may be mandatory or optional depending on the type of BOC stakeholder.
An important requirement of CPRS is the upload of digital images of company logo as well as photos and scanned signatures of major stockholders, principal officers and responsible officers.
The BOC believes that electronic registration into CPRS will provide for the efficient and pro-active processing of registration, accreditation and renewals of BOC stakeholders.
BOC also emphasizes that “before any transactions with the new e2m Customs System can be made, it is imperative that information pertaining to each client is captured in the CPRS.”
There are two methods by which client profile data will be encoded and submitted online to CPRS.
Shipping lines and agents, freight forwarders/consolidators and exporters will be given access to the BOC portal (www.customsgov.ph/nsw). Another group of BOC stakeholders (importers, customs brokers, off-dock CY-CFS, surety companies, airport warehouse and warehouse operators) will encode and submit data through any of the customs-accredited value-added service providers (VASPs) – Cargo Data Exchange Center, e-Konek Pilipinas, and InterCommerce Network Services).
Since September 10, the Association of International Shipping Lines and the Philippine Ship Agents Association had been asked to get their respective members ready for the system. Late last week formal notifications were sent to the Port Users Confederation and the Philippine Exporters Confederation together with BOC guidelines on the registration of stakeholders.
The VASPs began last week the “live” submission to CPRS of client profile data of their respective clients and subscribers. — LEO V. MORADA, IT Columnist

Back to Top

 

Marina to carriers: High fuel prices not enough to warrant rate adjustments

LOCAL shipping lines will have to cite reasons other than high fuel prices before their rate adjustment proposal is approved by the Maritime Industry Authority (Marina).
In an interview at the sidelines of the Supply Chain Management Association of the Philippines conference and exhibit last week, Marina administrator and concurrent Transport Undersecretary for Maritime Affairs Ma. Elena Bautista said, “Shipping lines should show concrete reasons aside from fuel if they want their proposal approved. I don’t think they can use fuel (alone) as reason considering prices have gone down significantly in the past couple of weeks.”
Besides, she said the government and carriers in a recent Cebu meeting agreed to temporarily hold rates. “I’m holding on to their (carriers) word,” Bautista said.
Cargo carriers National Marine Corp, Sulpicio Lines, Inc and Oceanic are seeking increases of 8%, 9% and 10%, respectively.
Last June 16, the three along with other member lines of the Philippine Liner Shipping Association implemented a 10% general rate increase (GRI). The increase is on top of the adoption of the 6-8% fuel surcharge.
The last time they implemented a GRI was in 2005.

Back to Top

 

North Harbor privatization gets boost

METRO Pacific Investment Corp (MPIC) is entering into a compromise agreement with the Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) for the public bidding of the Manila North Harbor Modernization project, the company said in a recent disclosure to the Philippine Stock Exchange.
The decision paves the way for the privatization of the port.
With joint venture partner Harbour Centre Port Terminals, Inc., MPIC emerged as the only qualified bidder for the 25-year management and operations contract for North Harbor. But the PPA declared the bidding a failure, claiming more than one bidder was needed to get the best possible. The joint venture partners elevated the matter to the courts.
No details have been released on the compromise agreement.
PPA general manager Atty. Oscar Sevilla earlier said the agency has been trying to get the partners to drop the case, noting the port is already in immediate need of rehabilitation by the private sector.

Back to Top