PortCalls
The Philippines only shipping and  transport guide.
 
5th Philippine Ports and Shipping 2009

::Industry News::

Archives 2006 Q2: May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December

June 5 | June 7 | June 12 | June 14 | June 19 | June 21 | June 26 | June 28


*ICTSI expects positive outcome in Guam deal

*Lorenzo sees higher revenues even with lower volumes

*Marina seeks collection of Nenaco's P21.15M unpaid supervision fees

*Keppel rakes in 42% more revenues

*Cotabato ports fall prey to budget problems

*Don't hold trucks too long, truckers' group appeals to BOC

*BOC requires written clearance for transhipment at freeport zones

 

 

ICTSI expects positive outcome in Guam deal

INTERNATIONAL Container Terminal Services, Inc. (ICTSI) officials are optimistic of the outcome of a meeting with Port Authority of Guam (PAG) officials for the privatization of Guam's Jose D. Guerero Commercial Port. Francis Andrews, ICTSI senior vice president, said there are some kinks in the bid that needs fine tuning before ICTSI can restart negotiations with PAG. Among Guam's new demands is for ICTSI, and not its subsidiary, to operate the port, a proposal which Andrews said is not feasible. He explained ICTSI cannot transfer to Guam to operate the facility, the very reason it created a subsidiary. In addition, it is also the firm's practice to create a subsidiary to operate every port it takes over. "We are going to challenge this position. Nonetheless, we are going to pursue our plans to bid for the port," Andrews stressed. In April, PAG port general manager Joseph Mesa terminated negotiations with ICTSI, which emerged late last year as the top bidder for privatization of the terminal. According to the bid documents, if the port authority is unable to reach a contract agreement with ICTSI, it has the option to negotiate with the next highest bidder or to cancel the proposal altogether. Jose D. Leon Guerrero Commercial port is the only terminal in the US territory which also serves as transshipment point for the entire Western Pacific region. The port is currently the largest US deepwater port in the region. For three consecutive years, it handled 2 million revenue tons of cargo. For fiscal year 2005, however, revenue tons dropped 1% to 2.042 million from the same figure in 2004. The number of containers processed grew 7% to 83,867 TEUs from 78,224 in fiscal year 2004. The total vessel calls decreased almost 20% to 1,327 from 1,648 in 2004 vessels, due to increased vessel regulations in US ports and decreasing fishing vessels.
The port has an average annual revenue of $26 million.


Back to Top

 

Lorenzo sees higher revenues even with lower volumes

CARGO carrier Lorenzo Shipping Corp. (LSC) reported a net revenue performance of P324.6 million in 2005, up 11.54% from the year-ago figure of P291 million. LSC said the increase in net revenue can be attributed to the full implementation of a 6.99% Automatic Fuel Rate adjustment in June 2005, the bunker surcharge increase which took effect in October 2005 and a series of freight increases in foreign cargoes. Lower volume contribution from various customer segments of domestic cargoes (forwarders, manufacturing companies and shipper-owned container shippers) however, pulled down by 7% container volume handled in 2005 compared to the volume recorded a year earlier. Rice shipments from Manila dropped significantly due to stiff competition on freight rates. Volume of agricultural products such as sugar and corn also declined during the first quarter of the year, as did livestock volume which was down 6% from last year due to a shortage in special container vans. Operating expenses, meanwhile, increased P25 million or 9.6% due to fuel price increases, the amortization of drydocking charges, manpower and repairs and maintenance costs.
Interest and financial charges grew 0.2%, attributed to the accrual of interest expense and discounting (interest factor) on redeemable preferred shares. Otherwise there would have been a decrease of P3.3 million or 20% as a result of repayment of loans. Miscellaneous income registered a P7 million or 52% reduction due to slower disposal of scrapped assets and less door-to-door shipments.


Back to Top

 
Marina seeks collection of Nenaco's P21.15M unpaid supervision fees

THE Maritime Industry Authority (Marina) has asked a Manila court for authority to collect millions of unpaid supervision feesof Negros Navigation Company (Nenaco) even if the firm is under rehabilitation. Marina administrator Vicente Suazo Jr., in a letter to the Regional Trial Court in Manila, said the agency intends to collect P21.15 million from debt-saddled Nenaco. The amount represents the firm's unpaid supervision fees incurred from 1998 to 2001, including surcharges and monthly interests. "In a long line of decisions by the Supreme Court, it was clearly established that supervision fees are considered taxes and the collection thereof is not subject to a restraining order or injunction order," Suazo argued in his letter. In October 2004, a local court approved Nenaco's petition for rehabilitation which allowed it to restructure P2.4 billion in debts over a 10-year period. The court also allowed the company to put off interest payments until the first half of the year and to suspend principal debt payments until 2008. Based on the Nenaco rehabilitation plan, debt payments will be divided into two groups: the first includes unpaid taxes; and the second, outstanding obligations, both secured and unsecured. Marina said Nenaco's total unpaid supervision fee during the period was at P31.86 million. The firm promised to pay five in installments starting September 30, 2003 until September 30, 2007. It was able to pay the first installment worth P6.37 million, but failed to pay the next two installments due 2004 and 2005, Marina said. It said the agency has levied a 50% surcharge on the debt as penalty and interest. The shipping firm reported a net loss of P29.2 million for the first quarter of the year, narrower than its net loss of P57.77 million in 2005. The company said it cut losses as a result of "significant improvements in the operations," including limiting the number of vessels that ply its routes to only six from nine last year.



Back to Top


Keppel rakes in 42% more revenues

KEPPEL Philippines Marine, Inc, (KPMI) and its subsidiaries turned in higher revenue at P385.4 million for the first quarter of 2006, 42.33% higher compared to the same period last year. KPMI attributed the increase to higher revenue from shipbuilding and five more high-value shiprepair jobs in 2006. Foreign vessels accounted for 66.35% of the shiprepair revenue. Net profit for the quarter jumped 33.77% to P53 million from the same period in 2005 due to higher sales and improved margins. The operating profit of P51.1 million was also up 55.64% from the 2005 figure. Investment and net interest income went down from P4.5 million in 2005 to P1 million in 2006 due to losses on foreign exchange transactions recorded during the period as a result of the strengthening of the Philippine peso against the US dollar. The share of results from associated companies during the quarter grew P1.4 million due to better results of Subic Shipyard and Consort Land during the period.


Back to Top

 

 

Cotabato ports fall prey to budget problems

LACK of budget and technical constraints have forced the Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) to slash funds earmarked for the upgrade of Cotabato ports. For the port management office in Cotabato, the agency is allotting P3.48 million from the P35 million originally sought. The P35 million was to have funded a P20-million wharf improvement and construction of a transit shed at the base port in Cotabato; construction of a P6 million two-story terminal operations office and port police division building; P7-million reclamation and concrete paving of the shore area; and P2 million construction of a terminal management port building. For the base port in Cotabato, PPA allotted P707,500, mainly for the acquisition of a new baggage x-ray machine and for repairs. The PPA is also setting aside P833,000 for the general maintenance of Kalamansig Port and P340,000 for the repair of its passenger terminal and steel gate. Some P1.6 million will go to the dredging of the Rio Grande de Mindanao channel between Bucana and the City Wharf. The PPA said dredging was important to stem the departure of ferry operators, including some roll-on-roll-off operators, who complain of depth problems as a result of siltation. It said the river port has a depth of 1.5 to 2.5 meters, way short of the minimum 4-meter draft requirement of larger barges. The river port is an essential artery to deliver goods and remains the lone gateway for passengers and cargo bound for inter-island destinations such as Kalamansig and Pagadian.


Back to Top

 

 

Don't hold trucks too long, truckers' group appeals to BOC

THE Confederation of Truckers Association of the Philippines (CTAP) wants the Bureau of Customs to show more prudence in apprehending and impounding trucks particularly those allegedly involving the carriage of misdeclared cargoes. CTAP said the current practice deprives truck owners and their drivers of their daily income, especially if the trucks have to stay for months at the BOC while the case is being investigated. CTAP president Rodolfo De Ocampo told PortCalls cargo trucks are not importers but mere instruments of their clients. "While admittedly, misdeclaration of imported goods is a violation of the Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines (TCCP), the violator is the importer of the goods and not the cargo truck. The situation may be otherwise if, through concrete proof, the cargo driver or trucker is a party to said misdeclaration. In such a case the trucker or driver, along with the importer may be prosecuted for violating the TCCP," he explained.
De Ocampo stressed that trucks should not be held too long because it only takes a day or two to extract particulars needed in the prosecution if the case involves the goods in transit and not the truck itself. The current practice keeps trucks at the BOC for days, even months, toge-ther with the cargo while the cargo misdeclaration case is being investigated. CTAP wants the BOC to immediately issue an order releasing all impounded cargo trucks from BOC custody and likewise order its officers that no truck should be ordered impounded unless there is a clear and concrete proof that the driver or owner is part of an alleged cargo misdeclaration or a conspirator to any TCCP violation.
The association also wants to put a limit on the holding period for trucks under investigation. - Christopher C. Paringit



Back to Top

 

BOC requires written clearance for transhipment at freeport zones

TRANSSHIPMENT cargoes and bonded articles subject of a constructive exportation and bond liquidation now need a written clearance from the Bureau of Customs resident collector at any freeport zone, the BOC said. Customs commissioner Napoleon Morales said he issued the order to protect the interest of government against abuses in the transshipment of goods. It also guards against the use of freeport zones as conduits for smuggling of bonded articles transferred from customs bonded warehouses. "To prevent this practice, all application for authority to transfer of these nature shall be processed, subject, however to prior submission of a duly notarized certification from the Customs collector assigned at the particular Freeport Zone as the port of destination, to serve as basis for cargo clearance and to prove that the consignee is existing and actively operational," Morales explained. Aside from this, Morales also ordered that liquidation of entry and subsequent cancellation of bonds will also not be allowed without the duly notarized clearance from the resident collector of Customs of the port of destination. The measure will prove that the transactions are legitimate and provide as conclusive proof that the duty and tax-free materials were received and accounted for the consignees' export requirements. It is also expected to prevent circumvention of customs laws, rules and regulation through the anomalous scheme of manipulating exportations of finished products or diversion of bonded materials and ensure appropriate documentation control, monitoring and accounting of goods transferred under constructive exportation to locators within the zone as provided under Customs Memoran-dum Order No. 39-91. The Port Users Confederation (PUC) said the order will only add to the red tape that port users face and the confusion as too many entries will be filed before the Customs collector to secure clearance. "The industry does not need this kind of regulation. It will only burden the company," the PUC said. - Christopher C. Paringit


Back to Top

 

 

 

Archives 2006 Q2: May | June | July | August | September | October | November | December

June 5 | June 7 | June 12 | June 14 | June 19 | June 21 | June 26 | June 28

Back to Top